It is often overlooked, but Response.Redirect has an overloaded method which has two parameters.

The first is like the overloaded version which gets only one parameter – the URL to redirect to.
The second is whether to end the request now or let it complete and only then redirect.

By default when calling the first version:


It will actually call the following code:

Response.Redirect(“”, true);

This means that the request will end right after the execution of the Response.Redirect function and no other code that is hooked to events that occur after the place in which you called Response.Redirect will execute.

For example, if you have a certain code at the Page_PreRender event and you are calling Response.Redirect in the Page_Load event (either on the page or in a control on the page), without using the overload version of Response.Redirect that gets two arguments and setting the second argument to “false”, the code in the Page_PreRender event will never get called.

While this seems very trivial, there are a lot of bugs that sometimes occur because people forget the Response.Redirect with one parameter stops the execution of the request.

Every time you call Response.Redirect, stop for a second and think if you really want to end the request at that point or let it continue to process until it finishes.

If you want it to continue processing the page and perform the redirection after the processing is done use the following code:

Response.Redirect(“”, false);

Thinking 2 seconds before writing a Reponse.Redirect code can save a lot of minutes debugging and figuring out that you never reach the other code because the request ended at the Response.Redirect call.

UPDATE: Fixed the last sample, thanks to Eber Irigoyen

Sometimes you need to to debug something that is simply doesn’t work as it should. It doesn’t throw an error so it’s a bit trickers to debug it with WinDbg or MDbg. In addition to that, you simply cannot (or should not) install a full blown Visual Studio installation on that machine.

For these scenarios exactly, Visual Studio’s remote debugging abilities exist.

At work, a friend had to debug such a problem. It didn’t throw an error and it worked on his machine (it always works on the developer’s machine 😉 ) but didn’t work on one of our test servers.

In order for the remote debugger of Visual Studio to work, one must install the Remote Debugger package that comes on the Visual Studio DVD on the remote computer. It’s a relatively small footprint installations.

NOTE: Be sure NOT to install this on a production server since the remote debugger needs to somehow talk to your debugger and it uses the network for that. Installing this (or at least keeping it enabled) on a production server might put the server at risk of being hacked!

Installing is the easy part. Now comes the configuration part since the debugging service authenticates both ways (both the machine running Visual Studio needs to authenticates on the remote machine, and the remote machine needs to authenticate on the machine running Visual Studio)

I’ve found two interesting article that can help you do that. One is a Knowledge Base article from Microsoft, the other a blog post for figuring out how to configure things when you are running in a domain-less (or domain different) envrionment:

  1. How to implement remote debugging in Visual Studio 2005
  2. Remote Debugging without domain accounts – from greggm’s blog.

If you follow these two articles you’ll get it up and running in no time.

If all else fails, printf debugging will probably still work (I’m referring to the broader definition of printf debugging which includes logging to a file/event log/whatever and not actually using printf’s to log stuff).

When working with a complex environment such as the ones being created by most (if not all) AJAX applications nowadays, one needs a set of tools in his/her arsenal to overcome any obstacle.

FireBug, a web development and debugging extension for Firefox is one such tool that you must keep close.

As it site says:

Firebug integrates with Firefox to put a wealth of development tools at your fingertips while you browse. You can edit, debug, and monitor CSS, HTML, and JavaScript live in any web page.

If you are not already using it go quickly, download and start working with it.

There are two major benefits of using FireBug when developing ASP.NET and AJAX.NET application:

  1. HTML Inspection – FireBug allows you during runtime and on any site, to inspect how the HTML looks. This includes direct references to the various stylesheets being used an element (including the casecading parts and from which .css file they came from). It also includes the ability to visualize the unvisible styling elements of padding and visualize so that you’ll visually see where the styling problem is as well as change the various style settings on the fly and immediately see the results.
  2. JavaScript Debugger – The JavaScript debugger and expression evaluator in FireBug are a lot easier to use and are a lot more powerful than the ones supplied by Internet Explorer combined with Visual Studio (or what is actually Active Scripting Debugging from the happy old COM days 🙂 ). Visual Studio is a very heavy debugger and sometimes lacks the ability to debug even sites and JavaScript that you just want to know how they work, without having the actual code of the site.

In the early days of AJAX.NET (or should I say in the “Atlas” days), FireBug was my main weapon of understanding the AJAX.NET framework and stepping line by line to understand how to use and work with AJAX.NET.

It’s an invaluable tool in your arsenal and with the usage of AJAX.NET increasing on a daily basis you just have to have it.

Rico Mariani, The man (with a capital “T”) for CLR performance and other related information, has posted this on his blog.

This post features a wealth of links to information and programs such as VADump (a fine program to list your memory usage in a given proccess) and some information about how to use it).

Links to the CLR Profiler (which I’m hoping to cover in one of the next posts) for both 1.1 and for Beta2.
And a small LogDump analyzer that he wrote.

I would recommend in generate to check his blog. He has some nice information there that can help anyone.


This is a bit off topic, but since I’ve already mentioned the Performance Monitor (perfmon) I’d thought I’ll address a behavior that some find intriguing.

When collecting performance information one must define a new counter log that will collect data from all relevant counters. When adding .NET counters to this log and openning the log file after running it for some time, sometimes you will see that it does not log .NET counters data and you will see them as if there is no data available on them.

This happens due to the credentials of the user running the performance monitor service.

So, how do we resolve it?

The solution is simple but is different between Windows 2000 and Windows XP/2003.

In Windows 2000, the only way of doing so is to change the user running the “Performance Logs and Alerts” service from the Services console.

In Windows XP and Windows 2003 a bit more thought was given to this issue and you can set the specific user that will run this counter log (its per counter log!).

To do so, just add the user at the “Run as” section and it will also question you for the password (as you can see by the screen shot below).

Hope this helps, Enjoy!